![]() ![]() The study’s modeling found a harvest between 16 and 88 wolves last fall would likely have caused the population to fall below 350 wolves. Treves and and fellow researcher Naomi Luochouarn used two methods the DNR has relied on for developing wolf population estimates and built a model to predict outcomes of those harvest scenarios. "And the DNR was not transparent about that risk, if they were even aware of it." "What we tried to show in this paper is that if you take into account the science, then a quota of more than 16 actually really creates some risk," Treves said. The board had approved a harvest of 300 wolves while the DNR set a quota of 130 wolves.Īdrian Treves, professor of environmental studies at UW-Madison, said his lab found any wolf hunt last fall risked Wisconsin’s wolf population dropping below the state’s management goal of 350 wolves. Those outcomes were based on quotas proposed by the Natural Resources Board, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and no harvest last fall. Even so, the study examined several potential outcomes that could have resulted from a second season. Researchers concluded a repeat of the February wolf hunt, during which hunters killed 218 wolves in less than three days, risked extirpation of wolves statewide except on tribal reservations.Ī Dane County judge placed Wisconsin’s second wolf hunt on hold last fall, and a federal judge restored protections for wolves in February. The study published in the scientific journal PLOS One found it’s more likely than not that a well-regulated hunt would have required placing wolves on the state threatened and endangered species list. 3.Researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison say a second wolf hunt last year would have risked Wisconsin’s wolf population dropping to undesirable levels that include the wolf possibly becoming endangered or extinct in Wisconsin.What is its view of the proposal to introduce an effective wolf management strategy modelled on that in other European countries? What is the Commission’s assessment of the conservation status of wolves in Germany, and what does it think about the exchange of German wolf packs with their packs of origin in Eastern and Southern Europe? What criteria will be taken into account for the regular reporting of the wolf’s conservation status? Wolf population management in other EU Member States like France and Sweden offers practical, sensible solutions for a sustainable wolf population management strategy that is in line with species protection regulations. The reform of the German Nature Protection Act in 2020 has not had the desired conservation effect. In many areas, livestock farming is already under serious threat. What is more, fencing off habitats creates barriers for other species and contributes to erosion of the landscape, leading to species decline. ![]() Preventive measures, such as the setting up of protected areas, have, in many areas, proven to be of scant effectiveness in protecting livestock. With wolf populations rising by 30% annually and wolves reproducing at an increasing rate in the sufficiently large habitats Germany offers, the animal’s conservation status can be said to be favourable in accordance with the criteria under the Habitats Directive. In many German federal states, local wolves have established stable populations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |